Do We Really Need ‘Independent Prosecutor’?


The president of the republic of Ghana had hinted of establishing the office of the independent prosecutor that would be clothed with all the powers to fight corruption. The role of this new office would be grounded in law to be able to bite anyone found to have engaged in act(s) of corruption. Some of these initiatives are good but my personal worry is that they are often just mere cosmetic exercise. However, to the proponent, It is believed that would solve all the corruption issues that are reported every now and then especially in the public and civil services. I reckon it’s only a duplication of roles and I think we don’t need it.

My first difficulty is the word ‘independent’. There is no such thing as independent so long as that office is the idea of someone or group of people. In other words, someone constitutes that office and therefore those working in there would owe some amount of allegiance to that person. For instance, the office of the EC is clearly an independent institution as per our constitution. But what do we do to anyone appointed to head that institution? When Charlotte Osei was appointed to head that institution, we knew what happened and I don’t have to remind you with all of that. Even though we all know the EC is an independent institution and therefore whoever is appointed to head it is supposed to be independent, there is this perception that once the person heading that office is appointed by someone, in this case the president, the appointee would owe some allegiance to the president otherwise there should be no qualms at all.

But I must admit that the way these institutions appear to go about their work is also suggestive of the fact that they pursue a certain agenda against perceived opponents of the ruling government. They are seen to be going after the opponents of the one who put them there. The way they approach the same allegation against members of the ruling government is completely different from what they do to perceived opponents. So their modus operandi becomes very questionable. Unless of course the new office of the ‘Independent Prosecutor’ would apply the same method in dealing with issues of corruption irrespective of whoever is involved – be it members of the ruling government or opposition – then the idea is highly welcome.

Let’s not forget that we don’t trust our institutions. When institutions with clear mandates are seen to be doing their work, we interfere in it unnecessarily while others openly accuse them of witch hunting. And this is very peculiar with our political parties. When they are in opposition, they see everything wrong with almost every state institution. They don’t trust whatever they do even if it’s genuinely done. So the politicians create the mistrust towards such institution and the general public, that knows very little about what goes on in there, joined in the bandwagon in condemning those manning the institution.

How would the office of the ‘Independent Prosecutor’ work? Would it sit down and expect formal complaints to be lodged before it for an action to be taken? Or once an alleged act of corruption is reported, the officials of the office of the independent prosecutor would act swiftly to bring those involved to answer questions and prosecute the affected individual. As it stands now, I believe the practice among institutions with such mandates must have formal complaints lodged with them before they take action. So if the new office would move away from this practice, that would be fine.
What we need is strengthening of the existing institutions mandated to deal with corruption. And US former president Obama clearly said so when he visited Ghana that what Africa needs is strong institutions. When we empower our institutions and allow them to do their work, there would be no need to form this committee or that committee/commission.


Our leaders must begin to respect the state institutions. They must stop the unnecessary interference in the affairs of those institutions. They must know that whatever they say about one state institution would have rippling effect on the public since their action often set agenda for what the general public make of the activities of those institutions. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

He Didn't Die Like a Soldier

He walked on the battlefield Bullets flying all around him Yet none flew close to his fur Because he was not a target He was safe even among reverberating grenades and tanks He did not swear to protect himself But his people...his own people at his own peril Yet he had to die at the hands of this blood-sucking barbarians Who mistook him for animal And pelted him with rocks His bones crunched as he pleaded for mercy His innocent blood was shed His frozen tears formed a confluence of blood Flowing freely like a fountain Mistake him not for a coward For pulling the trigger could have saved him From these wolves Who were only after sniffing his life out of him. He must die one day But not this way Not to be killed like a common criminal. He died in his prime serving his country, Serving his countrymen, Serving people who did not see his use - people who did not believe in him. He coul...
Read more

Safety Matters – Know Your Environment

Image
In this series as captioned above, I want us to discuss our environment. It is extremely important to know your environment in order to ensure your personal safety and the safety of those around you. Your environment can be your house, inside your car, inside a plane, your office, the street, school, hospital. Generally speaking, it refers to wherever you find yourself at a given time. It does not have to necessarily be enclosure.  Apart from your house and perhaps your car which are considered your most immediate environments and which you’re very familiar with, you need to be given orientation on those other environments that are a bit remote to you.  Let’s look at a few examples: when you board a flight, a flight attendant would explain to you all the safety measures you need to take during an emergency. For instance he would show you all the exit points on the flight, emphasising that you must use the nearest one during an emergency. When you work in an of...
Read more

The Unknown Truth About National Service

  The Ghana National Service Scheme was established by an Act of parliament in accordance with the constitution of Ghana. It is mandated to provide newly qualified graduates the opportunity to have practical exposure on the job, both in the public and private sectors, and as part of their civic responsibility to the State. It is worth knowing that every citizen of Ghana of at least 18 years of age has to, by the law; partake in the national service program before engaging in any kind of economic activity within the country.   Thus, national service is not only for citizens who have gone through formal education and want government or mainstream employment. In fact, if there was strict adherence to the mandate of the scheme, it would have been better understood than it is now. For example areas of concentration for the scheme include agriculture, cooperatives, education, health, local government, rural development, youth programs and a compulsory military training for ...
Read more